ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards

Freedom of association cases

Browse Cases by:
and search cases for:
  1. Case No 3362 (Canada) - Complaint date: 10-JUN-19United Steelworkers, Canadian Labour Congress (CLC), the Quebec Federation of Labour (FTQ) and IndustriALLThe complainant alleges that through public statements by its Prime Minister, the Government of Quebec impeded legitimate activities in defence of workers’ interests and failed in its obligation to respect and promote freedom of association and the effective recognition of the right to collective bargaining
  2. Definitive Report - Report No 392, October 2020 ( 406 - 445 )
    		3.
  3. Case No 3348 (Canada) - Complaint date: 15-FEB-19Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW) and Canadian Labour Congress (CLC)The complainant organization alleges that by enacting Bill C-89, an Act to provide for the resumption and continuation of postal services, the Government of Canada interrupted collective bargaining between the Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW) and the Canadian post and referred the dispute to mandatory mediation followed by compulsory and binding arbitration, thereby violating workers’ fundamental rights to organize, collective bargaining, and freedom of association
  4. Definitive Report - Report No 392, October 2020 ( 309 - 405 )
    		5.
  5. Case No 3151 (Canada) - Complaint date: 10-SEP-15Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) and Public Services International (PSI)
  6. Definitive Report - Report No 381, March 2017 ( 173 - 219 )
    		7.
  7. Case No 3143 (Canada) - Complaint date: 13-MAY-15Canadian Labour Congress (CLC)
  8. Definitive Report - Report No 381, March 2017 ( 173 - 219 )
    		9.
  9. Case No 3107 (Canada) - Complaint date: 05-DEC-14Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU)The complainant organization alleges that its members employed by the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) have been deprived of their fundamental right to strike and their right to freely negotiate the terms and conditions of their employment by virtue of a legislation (Toronto Transit Commission Labour Dispute Resolution, 2011) declaring the TTC to be an essential service
    		10.
  10. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 400, October 2022 ( 21 - 27 )
    		11.
  11. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 377, March 2016 ( 215 - 244 )
    		12.
  12. Case No 3057 (Canada) - Complaint date: 04-FEB-14National Union of Public and General Employees (NUPGE) supported by the Public Service International (PSI), the Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) and the Alberta Federation of Labour (AFL) The complainant organization alleges that the Government of Alberta adopted the Public Sector Services Continuation Act (Bill 45) with the intent to further limit collective rights of public sector employees in the province
    		13.
  13. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 378, June 2016 ( 23 - 26 )
    		14.
  14. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 374, March 2015 ( 184 - 219 )
    		15.
  15. Case No 3015 (Canada) - Complaint date: 13-MAR-13Canadian Office and Professional Employees Union (CTC), Syndicat des employées et employés professionels-les et de bureau – Québec (SEPB-Québec) and Syndicat des employées et employés professionels-les et de bureau, section locale 573 (SEPB CTC–FTQ) supported by the Québec Federation of Labour (FTQ) The complainant alleges that several provisions of the Anti-corruption Act violate the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining of construction workers by preventing an employees’ association from affiliating to certain trade union organizations by revoking existing certification, hindering collective bargaining and allowing Parliament to interfere in the activities of an employees’ association
    		16.
  16. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 374, March 2015 ( 142 - 183 )
    		17.
  17. Case No 3003 (Canada) - Complaint date: 08-JAN-13Canadian Labour Congress (CLC), on behalf of the Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario (ETFO-FEEO). The Canadian Teachers’ Federation (CTF) and Education International (EI) associate themselves with the complaint.The complainant organizations allege that the Government of Ontario infringed the right of teachers and supporting personnel in the public education sector to choose their representatives, engage in free and meaningful collective bargaining and engage in lawful strikes
  18. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 397, March 2022 ( 17 - 19 )
    		19.
  19. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 381, March 2017 ( 140 - 172 )
    		20.
  20. Case No 2983 (Canada) - Complaint date: 27-AUG-12International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM) supported by the Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) The complainant alleges that the Protecting Air Service Act violates air transport workers’ freedom of association and collective bargaining rights by mandatorily extending the duration of a collective bargaining agreement, prohibiting strikes, mandating compulsory final offer selection arbitration, ordering that the arbitration must be based on predetermined legislative criteria, forcing the unions to pay for the costs for the compulsory arbitration, and providing punitive sanctions on the IAM (and the Air Canada Pilots Association) and their representatives for non-compliance with the Act
    		21.
  21. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 370, October 2013 ( 227 - 292 )
    		22.
  22. Case No 2971 (Canada) - Complaint date: 04-JUN-12Fédération des travailleurs du Québec (FTQ-Construction) supported by the Conseil provincial du Québec des métiers de la construction (International) The complainant alleges that Bill 33 adopted by the Government of Quebec imposes on trade unions in the Quebec construction industry overriding conditions on bargaining, representation and the right to strike which restrict and impede the lawful exercise of the rights of workers’ and employees’ associations
    		23.
  23. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 370, October 2013 ( 195 - 226 )
    		24.
  24. Case No 2894 (Canada) - Complaint date: 15-AUG-11Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW–STTP)supported by the Canadian Labour Congress (CLC), the UNI Global Union and International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) The complainant organization alleges that by enacting Bill C-6, an Act to provide for the resumption and continuation of postal services, which terminated the strike, the Federal Government interrupted collective bargaining between the Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW–STTP) and the Canada Post Corporation and referred the dispute to compulsory and binding arbitration, thereby violating the right to freedom of association and setting a dangerous precedent of government intervention in labour disputes that do not involve essential services
    		25.
  25. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 367, March 2013 ( 270 - 345 )
    		26.
  26. Case No 2886 (Canada) - Complaint date: 22-JUL-11Association of Prosecutors in Criminal and Penal Prosecutions
    		27.
  27. Case No 2857 (Canada) - Complaint date: 19-APR-11Association of State Jurists (AJE)
  28. Case No 2848 (Canada) - Complaint date: 30-MAR-11Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW)The complainant organization alleges that section 13(5) of the Canada Post Corporation Act infringes upon freedom of association and collective bargaining rights
    		29.
  29. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 370, October 2013 ( 31 - 34 )
    		30.
  30. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 364, June 2012 ( 391 - 431 )
    		31.
  31. Case No 2821 (Canada) - Complaint date: 06-OCT-10Confederation of National Trade Unions (CSN)The complainant organization alleges the violation of the collective bargaining rights of the 6,500 workers represented by the Union of Canadian Correctional Officers (UCCO–SACC–CSN)
  32. Definitive Report - Report No 364, June 2012 ( 335 - 390 )
    		33.
  33. Case No 2803 (Canada) - Complaint date: 16-JUN-10Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE)The complainant organization alleges that the Government has passed legislation ordering the termination of a legal strike initiated by one of the complainant’s constituent local unions, thereby interrupting collective bargaining between the parties, referring the dispute over to compulsory and binding arbitration, violating the union’s right to strike, and setting a dangerous precedent of premature government intervention in labour disputes that do not involve essential service industries
  34. Definitive Report - Report No 360, June 2011 ( 324 - 344 )
    		35.
  35. Case No 2704 (Canada) - Complaint date: 23-MAR-09United Food and Commercial Workers’ Union – Canada (UFCW Canada) supported by the Canadian Labour Congress and UNI Global UnionThe complainant organization alleges that the Agricultural Employees Protection Act, 2002 (AEPA), of the Province of Ontario denies collective bargaining rights to all agricultural employees
  36. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 363, March 2012 ( 388 - 401 )
    		37.
  37. Interim Report - Report No 358, November 2010 ( 335 - 361 )
    		38.
  38. Case No 2654 (Canada) - Complaint date: 12-JUN-08National Union of Public and General Employees (NUPGE), Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) and Saskatchewan Federation of Labour (SFL) supported by Public Services International (PSI)The complainants allege that the Public Service Essential Services Act and the recently amended Trade Union Act impede workers from exercising their fundamental right to freedom of association by making it more difficult for workers to join unions, engage in free collective bargaining and exercise their right to strike
  39. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 380, October 2016 ( 18 - 26 )
    		40.
  40. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 371, March 2014 ( 36 - 43 )
    		41.
  41. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 367, March 2013 ( 28 - 44 )
    		42.
  42. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 356, March 2010 ( 313 - 384 )
    		43.
  43. Case No 2467 (Canada) - Complaint date: 01-FEB-06The Association of Attorney-General’s Prosecutors of Quebec (ASPGQ) — the Quebec Government Professional Staff Union (SPGQ) — the Association of State Jurists (AJE) — the Confederation of National Trade Unions (CNTU) — the Nurses’ Federation of Quebec (FIIQ) — the Independent Federation of Secondary Teachers (FAC) — the Quebec Confederation of Trade Unions (CSQ) — the Quebec Workers’ Federation (FTQ) — the Federation of Democratic Trade Unions (CSD) — the Quebec Union of Public Servants (SFPQ) — the Quebec State Teachers’ Union (SPEQ) and — the Quebec Provincial Association of Teachers (APEQ) The complainant organizations allege that the Government has passed a law (Act respecting conditions of employment in the public sector, S.Q. 2005, chapter 43) imposing conditions of employment on employees in the Quebec public sector without prior bargaining or consultation; violating their fundamental right to bargain collectively; taking away their right to strike without granting them an alternative procedure for the settlement of disputes such as mediation, conciliation or arbitration. The Association of Attorney-General’s Prosecutors of Quebec (ASPGQ) further alleges that the Prosecutors Act (as amended by the Act amending the Act respecting Attorney-General’s Prosecutors and the Labour Code, L.Q. 2004, chapter 22) denies prosecutors the right to join a trade union and deprives them of protection against hindrances, reprisals or sanctions related to the exercise of trade union rights
  44. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 344, March 2007 ( 461 - 587 )
    		45.
  45. Case No 2430 (Canada) - Complaint date: 07-JUN-05The National Union of Public and General Employees (NUPGE) on behalf of the Ontario Public Service Employees' Union (OPSEU) supported by the Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) and Public Services International (PSI)The complainant organizations challenge the provisions of a statute (Colleges Collective Bargaining Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.15) that denies all public colleges part-time employees the right to join a union and engage in collective bargaining
  46. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 378, June 2016 ( 18 - 22 )
    		47.
  47. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 374, March 2015 ( 25 - 30 )
    		48.
  48. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 362, November 2011 ( 39 - 44 )
    		49.
  49. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 358, November 2010 ( 37 - 42 )
    		50.
  50. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 356, March 2010 ( 40 - 42 )
    		51.
  51. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 353, March 2009 ( 66 - 68 )
    		52.
  52. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 350, June 2008 ( 41 - 43 )
    		53.
  53. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 348, November 2007 ( 50 - 52 )
    		54.
  54. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 343, November 2006 ( 339 - 363 )
    		55.
  55. Case No 2405 (Canada) - Complaint date: 31-JAN-05Education International (EI) on behalf of the Canadian Teachers’ Federation (CTF) and the British Columbia Teachers’ Federation (BCTF) The complainant organization alleges that the Government, in order to re-impose an arbitration decision that had been overturned by the British Columbia Supreme Court, has adopted unilaterally and without any consultation with social partners, retroactive legislation (Bill No. 19/2004) that modifies or eliminates numerous provisions from freely negotiated collective agreements in the education sector. These actions deprive teachers of lawful means to promote and defend their occupational interests, and undermine the right of the complainant organizations to act as bargaining agent for their members
  56. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 343, November 2006 ( 318 - 338 )
    		57.
  57. Interim Report - Report No 340, March 2006 ( 433 - 457 )
    		58.
  58. Case No 2403 (Canada) - Complaint date: 24-OCT-04The Centrale des syndicats démocratiques (CSD), Centrale des syndicats de Québec (CSQ) and Federation of Employees of Quebec (FTQ)The complainants allege that, without prior consultation with representative workers’ organizations, the Government of Quebec has introduced legislation amending the system of trade union representation and collective bargaining in the health and social affairs sectors, thereby infringing the freedom of association of the employees in question. The new compulsory certification structure involves cancelling certification of existing workers’ organizations, thereby forcing them to re-apply for certification; it either imposes or bans particular employees’ groups, on the basis of criteria that are unfavourable to workers and could lead to a decline in union membership. A ministerial decree suffices to bring any of these measures into effect. The new legislation amends the collective bargaining system by imposing bargaining at the local or regional level for particular matters, and fails to establish an arbitration mechanism offering the requisite conditions of independence and impartiality
    		59.
  59. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 338, November 2005 ( 536 - 603 )
    		60.
  60. Case No 2401 (Canada) - Complaint date: 26-NOV-04The Syndicat des professionnelles et professionnels du gouvernement de Québec (SPGQ) The complainants allege that, without prior consultation with representative workers’ organizations, the Government of Quebec has introduced legislation amending the system of trade union representation and collective bargaining in the health and social affairs sectors, thereby infringing the freedom of association of the employees in question. The new compulsory certification structure involves cancelling certification of existing workers’ organizations, thereby forcing them to re-apply for certification; it either imposes or bans particular employees’ groups, on the basis of criteria that are unfavourable to workers and could lead to a decline in union membership. A ministerial decree suffices to bring any of these measures into effect. The new legislation amends the collective bargaining system by imposing bargaining at the local or regional level for particular matters, and fails to establish an arbitration mechanism offering the requisite conditions of independence and impartiality
    		61.
  61. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 338, November 2005 ( 536 - 603 )
    		62.
  62. Case No 2349 (Canada) - Complaint date: 20-MAY-04The National Union of Public and General Employees (NUPGE) on behalf of the Newfoundland and Labrador Association of Public and Private Employees (NAPE/NUPGE) and supported by the Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) and Public Services International (PSI) The complainant organization alleges that the Government did not bargain collectively in good faith with representative trade unions for the renewal of public service collective agreements, and did not rely on an independent arbitration system. Rather, the Government introduced back-to-work legislation (Bill No. 18) with harsh penalties to end a legal strike and impose by law a four-year collective contract containing wage freezes and contract concessions, including as regards some benefits previously negotiated for retired public servants
  63. Definitive Report - Report No 337, June 2005 ( 361 - 407 )
    		64.
  64. Case No 2343 (Canada) - Complaint date: 10-MAY-04The Confederation of National Trade Unions (CSN)The complainants allege that, without prior consultation with representative workers’ organizations, the Government of Quebec has introduced legislation amending the system of trade union representation and collective bargaining in the health and social affairs sectors, thereby infringing the freedom of association of the employees in question. The new compulsory certification structure involves cancelling certification of existing workers’ organizations, thereby forcing them to re-apply for certification; it either imposes or bans particular employees’ groups, on the basis of criteria that are unfavourable to workers and could lead to a decline in union membership. A ministerial decree suffices to bring any of these measures into effect. The new legislation amends the collective bargaining system by imposing bargaining at the local or regional level for particular matters, and fails to establish an arbitration mechanism offering the requisite conditions of independence and impartiality
    		65.
  65. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 338, November 2005 ( 536 - 603 )
    		66.
  66. Case No 2333 (Canada) - Complaint date: 30-MAR-04The Centre of Democratic Trade Unions (CSD), the Quebec Trade Union Centre (CSQ) and the Quebec Workers’ Federation (FTQ)The complainant organizations allege legislative interference by the Government to cancel the trade union registrations of certain workers in social and health services (Bill No. 7) and childcare services (Bill No. 8). The Government is thereby depriving them of employee status under the Labour Code and is redefining them as independent workers, denying them the right to unionize; it obliges them to form “representative” organizations with responsibility for concluding agreements on working conditions, which are, in fact, at the mercy of the authorities, and is denying them the right to bargain collectively through independent trade union organizations
  67. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 340, March 2006 ( 373 - 432 )
    		68.
  68. Case No 2324 (Canada) - Complaint date: 06-FEB-04The National Union of Public and General Employees (NUPGE), on behalf of the BC Government and Services Employees’ Union (BCGEU) and the Health Sciences Association of British Columbia (HSABC) supported by the Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) and Public Services International (PSI) The complainant organization alleges that the Government of British Columbia has adopted a law (Bill 94) which nullifies any clauses of collective agreements in the health sector that restrict or regulate the employer’s ability to contract out. The complainant also criticizes the adoption of a law (Bill 18) which allows private contractors to override contracting-out provisions contained in existing collective agreements, and of a back-to-work legislation (Bill 95) putting an end to a legal strike of its members in the newly privatized BC Ferry Corporation
  69. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 336, March 2005 ( 233 - 284 )
    		70.
  70. Case No 2314 (Canada) - Complaint date: 19-DEC-03The Confederation of National Trade Unions (CSN) supported by Public Services International (PSI) The complainant organizations allege legislative interference by the Government to cancel the trade union registrations of certain workers in social and health services (Bill No. 7) and childcare services (Bill No. 8). The Government is thereby depriving them of employee status under the Labour Code and is redefining them as independent workers, denying them the right to unionize; it obliges them to form “representative” organizations with responsibility for concluding agreements on working conditions, which are, in fact, at the mercy of the authorities, and is denying them the right to bargain collectively through independent trade union organizations
  71. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 340, March 2006 ( 373 - 432 )
    		72.
  72. Case No 2305 (Canada) - Complaint date: 09-OCT-03Education International (EI) on behalf of the Canadian Teachers' Federation (CTF), the Ontario Teachers' Federation (OTF) and the Ontario English Catholic Teachers' Association (OECTA)The complainants allege that the Government of Ontario has adopted back-to-work legislation (Bill 28), the fifth of its kind in five years, which ended a legal work-to-rule campaign, unilaterally imposed a mediation-arbitration scheme that does not meet requirements of independence and impartiality, and brought additional restrictions on the collective bargaining rights of teachers
  73. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 342, June 2006 ( 35 - 38 )
    		74.
  74. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 338, November 2005 ( 35 - 37 )
    		75.
  75. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 337, June 2005 ( 30 - 32 )
    		76.
  76. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 335, November 2004 ( 471 - 512 )
    		77.
  77. Case No 2278 (Canada) - Complaint date: 11-JUN-03L'Association des substituts du Procureur géneral de Québec
  78. Case No 2277 (Canada) - Complaint date: 09-JUN-03The Alberta Union of Provincial Employees (AUPE)The complainant organization alleges that the provincial Government significantly altered the rights to organize and to bargain collectively of health-care sector employees, through the speedy adoption of legislation, without proper consultations with trade unions
  79. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 337, June 2005 ( 343 - 360 )
    		80.
  80. Interim Report - Report No 333, March 2004 ( 240 - 277 )
    		81.
  81. Case No 2257 (Canada) - Complaint date: 18-MAR-03The National Confederation of Managerial Staff of Quebec (CNCQ), the Association of Senior Managerial Staff of Health and Social Services (ACSSSS), the Association of Branch Managers of the "Société des Alcools du Québec" (ADDS/SAQ) and the Association of Managerial Staff of the "Société des casinos du Québec" (ACSQ)The complainant organizations allege that there is no legislative protection of their right of association against employer interference, that they have been prevented from conducting collective bargaining, that the right of managerial staff in Quebec to bargain collectively regarding their working conditions is not respected and that there is a lack of mechanisms for settling disputes in the absence of the right to strike
  82. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 370, October 2013 ( 27 - 30 )
    		83.
  83. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 362, November 2011 ( 33 - 38 )
    		84.
  84. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 358, November 2010 ( 31 - 36 )
    		85.
  85. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 355, November 2009 ( 29 - 33 )
    		86.
  86. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 342, June 2006 ( 31 - 34 )
    		87.
  87. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 335, November 2004 ( 412 - 470 )
    		88.
  88. Case No 2196 (Canada) - Complaint date: 14-MAY-02The Canadian Association of University Teachers (CAUT)The complainants allege that the Government of British Columbia has adopted several pieces of legislation (Bills Nos. 2, 15, 18, 27, 28 and 29) in respect of public service employees, which contravene ILO Conventions and freedom of association principles on collective bargaining.
  89. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 340, March 2006 ( 45 - 49 )
    		90.
  90. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 333, March 2004 ( 23 - 30 )
    		91.
  91. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 330, March 2003 ( 239 - 305 )
    		92.
  92. Case No 2182 (Canada) - Complaint date: 09-MAR-02The Ontario Federation of Labour (OFL) and the Canada Labour Congress (CLC)The complainants allege that some provisions of the Ontario Labour Relations Act encourage the decertification of workers’ organizations by requiring employers to post and distribute in the workplace documents setting out the process to terminate trade union bargaining rights.
  93. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 338, November 2005 ( 32 - 34 )
    		94.
  94. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 337, June 2005 ( 27 - 29 )
    		95.
  95. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 333, March 2004 ( 20 - 22 )
    		96.
  96. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 330, March 2003 ( 306 - 334 )
    		97.
  97. Case No 2180 (Canada) - Complaint date: 01-MAR-02The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC), the National Union of Public and General Employees (NUPGE), the British Columbia Government and Service Employees’ Union (BCGSEU), the Health Sciences Association of British Columbia (HSA), the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU) and Public Services International (PSI) The complainants allege that the Government of British Columbia has adopted several pieces of legislation (Bills Nos. 2, 15, 18, 27, 28 and 29) in respect of public service employees, which contravene ILO Conventions and freedom of association principles on collective bargaining.
  98. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 340, March 2006 ( 45 - 49 )
    		99.
  99. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 333, March 2004 ( 23 - 30 )
    		100.
  100. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 330, March 2003 ( 239 - 305 )
    		101.
  101. Case No 2173 (Canada) - Complaint date: 07-FEB-02The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC), the British Columbia Nurses’ Union (BCNU), the Canadian Teachers’ Federation (CTF), the British Columbia Teachers’ Federation (BCTF), the Canadian Union of Public Employees, British Columbia Division (CUPE), the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU) and Education International (EI)The complainants allege that the Government of British Columbia has adopted several pieces of legislation (Bills Nos. 2, 15, 18, 27, 28 and 29) in respect of public service employees, which contravene ILO Conventions and freedom of association principles on collective bargaining.
  102. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 357, June 2010 ( 30 - 34 )
    		103.
  103. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 354, June 2009 ( 35 - 46 )
    		104.
  104. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 340, March 2006 ( 45 - 49 )
    		105.
  105. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 333, March 2004 ( 23 - 30 )
    		106.
  106. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 330, March 2003 ( 239 - 305 )
    		107.
  107. Case No 2166 (Canada) - Complaint date: 18-DEC-01The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC), the National Union of Public and General Employees (NUPGE), the Health Sciences Association of British Columbia (HSA), the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU) and Public Services International (PSI) The complainants allege that the Government of British Columbia has adopted several pieces of legislation (Bills Nos. 2, 15, 18, 27, 28 and 29) in respect of public service employees, which contravene ILO Conventions and freedom of association principles on collective bargaining.
  108. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 340, March 2006 ( 45 - 49 )
    		109.
  109. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 333, March 2004 ( 23 - 30 )
    		110.
  110. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 330, March 2003 ( 239 - 305 )
    		111.
  111. Case No 2145 (Canada) - Complaint date: 03-JUL-01Education International (EI), the Canadian Teachers' Federation (CTF), the Ontario Teachers' Federation (OTF) and the Elementary Teachers' Federation of Ontario (ETFO)Interference in collective bargaining; violations of the right to strike; limitations of arbitration process
  112. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 330, March 2003 ( 46 - 48 )
    		113.
  113. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 327, March 2002 ( 260 - 311 )
    		114.
  114. Case No 2119 (Canada) - Complaint date: 01-MAR-01The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) and the Ontario Secondary School Teachers' Federation (OSSTF)Interference with collective bargaining
  115. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 330, March 2003 ( 42 - 45 )
    		116.
  116. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 327, March 2002 ( 214 - 259 )
    		117.
  117. Case No 2083 (Canada) - Complaint date: 17-APR-00The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC), the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) and the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU)Violation of the right to bargain collectively of certain public sector employees
  118. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 330, March 2003 ( 39 - 41 )
    		119.
  119. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 328, June 2002 ( 15 - 17 )
    		120.
  120. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 327, March 2002 ( 39 - 41 )
    		121.
  121. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 324, March 2001 ( 235 - 256 )
    		122.
  122. Case No 2025 (Canada) - Complaint date: 14-MAY-99Education International (EI), the Canadian Teachers' Federation (CTF), the Ontario Teachers' Federation (OTF) and the Ontario English Catholic Teachers' Association (OECTA)Interference with the right to strike and to bargain collectively of teachers; lack of consultation prior to adopting legislation
    		123.
  123. Definitive Report - Report No 320, March 2000 ( 374 - 414 )
    		124.
  124. Case No 1999 (Canada) - Complaint date: 15-DEC-98The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC)Back-to-work legislation; obstacles to collective bargaining (energy sector)
  125. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 321, June 2000 ( 22 - 24 )
    		126.
  126. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 318, November 1999 ( 119 - 171 )
    		127.
  127. Case No 1985 (Canada) - Complaint date: 25-SEP-98The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC)Government interference in collective bargaining (postal sector)
  128. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 320, March 2000 ( 41 - 43 )
    		129.
  129. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 318, November 1999 ( 23 - 25 )
    		130.
  130. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 316, June 1999 ( 275 - 326 )
    		131.
  131. Case No 1975 (Canada) - Complaint date: 21-JUL-98The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC)Denial of the right to organize
  132. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 333, March 2004 ( 20 - 22 )
    		133.
  133. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 330, March 2003 ( 35 - 38 )
    		134.
  134. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 327, March 2002 ( 36 - 38 )
    		135.
  135. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 324, March 2001 ( 27 - 29 )
    		136.
  136. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 323, November 2000 ( 45 - 48 )
    		137.
  137. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 321, June 2000 ( 103 - 118 )
    		138.
  138. Interim Report - Report No 316, June 1999 ( 229 - 274 )
    		139.
  139. Case No 1951 (Canada) - Complaint date: 02-FEB-98The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) and the Ontario Secondary School Teachers' Federation (OSSTF)Interference with collective bargaining; denial of the right to organize, to bargain collectively and to strike of principals and vice-principals; lack of protection against anti-union discrimination and employer interference
  140. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 333, March 2004 ( 20 - 22 )
    		141.
  141. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 330, March 2003 ( 32 - 34 )
    		142.
  142. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 327, March 2002 ( 33 - 35 )
    		143.
  143. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 326, November 2001 ( 31 - 33 )
    		144.
  144. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 325, June 2001 ( 197 - 215 )
    		145.
  145. Interim Report - Report No 316, June 1999 ( 214 - 228 )
    		146.
  146. Interim Report - Report No 311, November 1998 ( 170 - 234 )
    		147.
  147. Case No 1943 (Canada) - Complaint date: 12-NOV-97The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC), the Service Employees International Union, Local 204 (SEIU) and the Ontario Federation of LabourGovernmental interference in arbitration and labour tribunals
  148. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 333, March 2004 ( 17 - 19 )
    		149.
  149. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 332, November 2003 ( 25 - 27 )
    		150.
  150. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 330, March 2003 ( 28 - 31 )
    		151.
  151. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 324, March 2001 ( 24 - 26 )
    		152.
  152. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 320, March 2000 ( 38 - 40 )
    		153.
  153. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 318, November 1999 ( 103 - 118 )
    		154.
  154. Interim Report - Report No 311, November 1998 ( 151 - 169 )
    		155.
  155. Interim Report - Report No 310, June 1998 ( 185 - 242 )
    		156.
  156. Case No 1928 (Canada) - Complaint date: 28-MAY-97Education International (EI), the Canadian Teachers' Federation and the Manitoba Teachers' Society (MTS)Denial of the right of teachers to bargain collectively, legislative interference with the independence of arbitration
  157. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 311, November 1998 ( 28 - 30 )
    		158.
  158. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 310, June 1998 ( 134 - 184 )
    		159.
  159. Case No 1900 (Canada) - Complaint date: 23-AUG-96The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC)Legislative repeal of statutory access to collective bargaining, termination of existing organizing rights and nullification of collective agreements
  160. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 330, March 2003 ( 24 - 27 )
    		161.
  161. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 316, June 1999 ( 28 - 30 )
    		162.
  162. Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 309, March 1998 ( 11 - 15 )
    		163.
  163. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 308, November 1997 ( 139 - 194 )
    		164.
  164. Case No 1859 (Canada) - Complaint date: 20-OCT-95The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) and the Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC)Restrictions on the scope of collective bargaining
  165. Definitive Report - Report No 306, March 1997 ( 177 - 247 )
    		166.
  166. Case No 1806 (Canada) - Complaint date: 24-OCT-94The Government of Canada (Yukon) presented by the Education International (EI) and the Yukon Teachers' Association (YTA)Legislative restrictions on collective bargaining
  167. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 300, November 1995 ( 101 - 129 )
    		168.
  168. Case No 1802 (Canada) - Complaint date: 08-OCT-94The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC), the National Union of Provincial Government Employees (NUPGE), the Nova Scotia Government Employees' Union (NSGEU), the Canadian Association of University Teachers (CAUT), the Nova Scotia Confederation of University Faculty Associations (NSCUFA), Public Services International (PSI) and the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU)
  169. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 299, June 1995 ( 248 - 284 )
    		170.
  170. Case No 1801 (Canada) - Complaint date: 06-OCT-94The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) and various national and local unions
  171. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 297, March 1995 ( 231 - 271 )
    		172.
  172. Case No 1800 (Canada) - Complaint date: 06-OCT-94The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC), the Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC) and the Public Services International (PSI)
  173. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 299, June 1995 ( 155 - 186 )
    		174.
  174. Case No 1779 (Canada) - Complaint date: 08-JUN-94The Canadian Federation of Labour (CFL) and various national and local trade unions
  175. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 297, March 1995 ( 231 - 271 )
    		176.
  176. Case No 1758 (Canada) - Complaint date: 10-FEB-94The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC), the Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC), the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU) and the Public Services International (PSI)
  177. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 297, March 1995 ( 190 - 230 )
    		178.
  178. Case No 1750 (Canada) - Complaint date: 21-SEP-93The Quebec Federation of Labour (FTQ), the Canadian Labour Congress (CTC), various trade union organizations of Canada/Quebec, and the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU)
  179. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 299, June 1995 ( 187 - 247 )
    		180.
  180. Case No 1749 (Canada) - Complaint date: 21-SEP-93The Quebec Federation of Labour (FTQ), the Canadian Labour Congress (CTC), various trade union organizations of Canada/Quebec, and the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU)
  181. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 299, June 1995 ( 187 - 247 )
    		182.
  182. Case No 1748 (Canada) - Complaint date: 03-DEC-93The Union of Government Professionals of Quebec (SPGQ)
  183. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 299, June 1995 ( 187 - 247 )
    		184.
  184. Case No 1747 (Canada) - Complaint date: 06-DEC-93The Quebec Central Teachers' Union (CEQ)
  185. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 299, June 1995 ( 187 - 247 )
    		186.
  186. Case No 1743 (Canada) - Complaint date: 06-DEC-93The Confederation of National Trade Unions (CNTU)
  187. Definitive Report - Report No 295, November 1994 ( 39 - 86 )
    		188.
  188. Case No 1738 (Canada) - Complaint date: 26-OCT-93The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC)Hindrances to trade unions' functioning
    		189.
  189. Case No 1737 (Canada) - Complaint date: 09-AUG-93The Canadian Association of Smelter and Allied Workers (CASAW)Biased conduct and interference by police in a labour dispute
  190. Definitive Report - Report No 305, November 1996 ( 102 - 116 )
    		191.
  191. Interim Report - Report No 294, June 1994 ( 683 - 715 )
    		192.
  192. Case No 1735 (Canada) - Complaint date: 30-SEP-93The Building and Construction Trades Department (AFL-CIO) and the Canadian Federation of Labour (CFL)
  193. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 294, June 1994 ( 420 - 476 )
    		194.
  194. Case No 1733 (Canada) - Complaint date: 21-SEP-93The Confederation of National Trade Unions (CNTU) and the Quebec Provincial Civil Service Union (SFPQ)
  195. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 299, June 1995 ( 187 - 247 )
    		196.
  196. Case No 1722 (Canada) - Complaint date: 29-JUN-93The Canadian Association of University Teachers (CAUT) and the Canadian Labour Congress (CLC)
    		197.
  197. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 292, March 1994 ( 511 - 554 )
    		198.
  198. Case No 1715 (Canada) - Complaint date: 12-MAY-93The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC), the National Union of Provincial Government Employees (NUPGE) and the Manitoba Government Employees Union (MGEU)
  199. Definitive Report - Report No 292, March 1994 ( 146 - 196 )
    		200.
  200. Case No 1681 (Canada) - Complaint date: 03-NOV-92The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) and the Transportation-Communications Union (TCU)
  201. Definitive Report - Report No 286, March 1993 ( 153 - 167 )
    		202.
  202. Case No 1670 (Canada) - Complaint date: 17-SEP-92The Economists', Sociologists' and Statisticians' Association (ESSA)
  203. Definitive Report - Report No 287, June 1993 ( 97 - 132 )
    		204.
  204. Case No 1624 (Canada) - Complaint date: 06-FEB-92The World Confederation of Organizations of the Teaching Profession (WCOTP) and the Nova Scotia Teachers' Union (NSTU)
  205. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 286, March 1993 ( 194 - 229 )
    		206.
  206. Case No 1616 (Canada) - Complaint date: 20-DEC-91The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) and the Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC)
  207. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 284, November 1992 ( 595 - 641 )
    		208.
  208. Case No 1607 (Canada) - Complaint date: 31-OCT-91The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC), the National Union of Provincial Government Employees (NUPGE) and the Newfoundland Association of Public Employees (NAPE)
  209. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 284, November 1992 ( 549 - 594 )
    		210.
  210. Case No 1606 (Canada) - Complaint date: 31-OCT-91The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC), the National Union of Provincial Government Employees (NUPGE) and the Nova Scotia Government Employees Union (NSGEU)
  211. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 284, November 1992 ( 506 - 548 )
    		212.
  212. Case No 1605 (Canada) - Complaint date: 31-OCT-91The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC), the National Union of Provincial Government Employees (NUPGE) and the New Brunswick Government Employees Union (NBGEU)
  213. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 284, November 1992 ( 459 - 505 )
    		214.
  214. Case No 1604 (Canada) - Complaint date: 31-OCT-91The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC), the National Union of Provincial Government Employees (NUPGE) and the Manitoba Government Employees Association (MGEA)
  215. Definitive Report - Report No 284, November 1992 ( 286 - 325 )
    		216.
  216. Case No 1603 (Canada) - Complaint date: 31-OCT-91The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC), the National Union of Provincial Government Employees (NUPGE) and the British Columbia Government Employees Union (BCGEU)
  217. Definitive Report - Report No 284, November 1992 ( 57 - 81 )
    		218.
  218. Case No 1601 (Canada) - Complaint date: 29-AUG-91The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) and the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE)
  219. Definitive Report - Report No 284, November 1992 ( 27 - 56 )
    		220.
  220. Case No 1587 (Canada) - Complaint date: 30-JUN-91The World Confederation of Organisations of the Teaching Profession (WCOTP)
  221. Case No 1547 (Canada) - Complaint date: 11-SEP-90The Canadian Association of University Teachers (CAUT)
  222. Definitive Report - Report No 277, March 1991 ( 99 - 114 )
    		223.
  223. Case No 1526 (Canada) - Complaint date: 12-MAR-90THE CONFEDERATION OF NATIONAL TRADE UNIONS (CNTU) AND THE FEDERATION OF QUEBEC PROFESSIONAL UNIONS OF NURSES (FQPUN)
  224. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 279, November 1991 ( 218 - 269 )
    		225.
  225. Case No 1451 (Canada) - Complaint date: 25-APR-88THE CANADIAN LABOUR CONGRESS (CLC) AND THE POSTAL, TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE INTERNATIONAL (PTTI)Anti-strike law (postal branch)
  226. Definitive Report - Report No 268, November 1989 ( 46 - 104 )
    		227.
  227. Case No 1438 (Canada) - Complaint date: 15-FEB-88THE CANADIAN LABOUR CONGRESS (CLC)Anti-strike legislation in the railway sector
  228. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 265, June 1989 ( 375 - 402 )
    		229.
  229. Case No 1430 (Canada) - Complaint date: 13-OCT-87THE CANADIAN LABOUR CONGRESS (CLC)Legislation
  230. Definitive Report - Report No 256, June 1988 ( 131 - 195 )
    		231.
  231. Case No 1394 (Canada) - Complaint date: 19-FEB-87THE CANADIAN LABOUR CONGRESS (CLC)
  232. Definitive Report - Report No 253, November 1987 ( 101 - 142 )
    		233.
  233. Case No 1356 (Canada) - Complaint date: 09-DEC-85THE WORLD CONFEDERATION OF LABOUR (WCL), THE QUEBEC CENTRAL TEACHERS' UNION (CEQ), AND THE WORLD CONFEDERATION OF ORGANISATIONS OF THE TEACHING PROFESSION (WCOTP)
  234. Definitive Report - Report No 248, March 1987 ( 67 - 147 )
    		235.
  235. Case No 1350 (Canada) - Complaint date: 08-OCT-85THE WORLD CONFEDERATION OF ORGANISATIONS OF THE TEACHING PROFESSION (WCOTP)
  236. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 243, March 1986 ( 293 - 311 )
    		237.
  237. Case No 1329 (Canada) - Complaint date: 12-APR-85THE CANADIAN LABOUR CONGRESS (CLC) AND THE WORLD CONFEDERATION OF ORGANISATIONS OF THE TEACHING PROFESSION (WCOTP)
  238. Definitive Report - Report No 243, March 1986 ( 159 - 190 )
    		239.
  239. Case No 1260 (Canada) - Complaint date: 03-FEB-84The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) on behalf of the Newfoundland Association of Public Employees (NAPE)
  240. Definitive Report - Report No 241, November 1985 ( 97 - 155 )
    		241.
  241. Case No 1247 (Canada) - Complaint date: 01-NOV-83The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) on behalf of of the Alberta Union of Provincial Employees
  242. Definitive Report - Report No 241, November 1985 ( 97 - 155 )
    		243.
  243. Case No 1235 (Canada) - Complaint date: 22-SEP-83The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC)
  244. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 234, June 1984 ( 316 - 328 )
    		245.
  245. Case No 1234 (Canada) - Complaint date: 19-SEP-83The Confederation of Alberta Faculty Associations (CAFA)
  246. Definitive Report - Report No 241, November 1985 ( 97 - 155 )
    		247.
  247. Case No 1226 (Canada) - Complaint date: 14-JUL-83The Christian Labour Association of Canada (CLAC)
  248. Definitive Report - Report No 234, June 1984 ( 46 - 65 )
    		249.
  249. Case No 1173 (Canada) - Complaint date: 29-DEC-82The World Confederation of Organisations of the Teaching Profession (WCOTP)
  250. Definitive Report - Report No 234, June 1984 ( 75 - 91 )
    		251.
  251. Interim Report - Report No 230, November 1983 ( 551 - 578 )
    		252.
  252. Case No 1172 (Canada) - Complaint date: 15-NOV-82THE CANADIAN LABOUR CONGRESS (CLC), THE WORLD CONFEDERATION OF ORGANISATIONS OF THE TEACHING PROFESSION AND THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION
  253. Definitive Report - Report No 241, November 1985 ( 97 - 155 )
    		254.
  254. Case No 1171 (Canada) - Complaint date: 25-NOV-82THE FEDERATION OF ASSOCIATIONS OF UNIVERSITY LECTURERS, THE UNION OF GOVERNMENT SALARIED STAFF, THE UNION OF UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEES, THE FEDERATION OF NURSING OCCUPATION UNIONS, THE QUEBEC PROVINCIAL CIVIL SERVICE UNION, THE QUEBEC CENTRAL TEACHERS UNION, THE WORLD FEDERATION OF TEACHERS UNIONS, THE WORLD LABOUR CONFEDERATION AND THE WORLD CONFEDERATION OF ORGANIZATIONS OF THE TEACHING PROFESSION
  255. Definitive Report - Report No 230, November 1983 ( 114 - 171 )
    		256.
  256. Case No 1147 (Canada) - Complaint date: 08-JUL-82PROFESSIONAL INSTITUTE OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE OF CANADA, THE CANADIAN LABOUR CONGRESS AND SEVERAL OTHER TRADE UNION ORGANISATIONS
  257. Definitive Report - Report No 222, March 1983 ( 97 - 121 )
    		258.
  258. Case No 1071 (Canada) - Complaint date: 06-JUL-81THE CANADIAN LABOUR CONGRESS Violation of the right to strike and to collective bargaining of civil servants
  259. Definitive Report - Report No 214, March 1982 ( 235 - 249 )
    		260.
  260. Case No 1070 (Canada) - Complaint date: 06-JUL-81THE CANADIAN LABOUR CONGRESS Violation of the right to strike and to collective bargaining of civil servants
  261. Definitive Report - Report No 214, March 1982 ( 221 - 234 )
    		262.
  262. Case No 1055 (Canada) - Complaint date: 18-JUN-81Alberta Association of College Faculties (AACF)
  263. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 214, March 1982 ( 332 - 350 )
    		264.
  264. Case No 964 (Canada) - Complaint date: 30-APR-80THE CANADIAN LABOUR CONGRESS
  265. Definitive Report - Report No 208, June 1981 ( 20 - 37 )
    		266.
  266. Case No 931 (Canada) - Complaint date: 10-MAY-79THE WORLD CONFEDERATION OF LABOUR AND THE WORLD FEDERATION OF TRADE UNIONS
  267. Definitive Report - Report No 202, June 1980 ( 192 - 215 )
    		268.
  268. Case No 903 (Canada) - Complaint date: 09-MAR-78THE ECONOMISTS', SOCIOLOGISTS' AND STATISTICIANS' ASSOCIATION
  269. Definitive Report - Report No 194, June 1979 ( 37 - 60 )
    		270.
  270. Definitive Report - Report No 187, November 1978 ( 55 - 68 )
    		271.
  271. Case No 893 (Canada) - Complaint date: 04-NOV-77THE CANADIAN LABOUR CONGRESS AND THE CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY TEACHERS
  272. Definitive Report - Report No 204, November 1980 ( 121 - 134 )
    		273.
  273. Definitive Report - Report No 202, June 1980 ( 18 - 26 )
    		274.
  274. Definitive Report - Report No 194, June 1979 ( 92 - 118 )
    		275.
  275. Interim Report - Report No 187, November 1978 ( 512 - 546 )
    		276.
  276. Case No 886 (Canada) - Complaint date: 20-JUL-77THE CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY TEACHERS AND THE CANADIAN LABOUR CONGRESS
  277. Definitive Report - Report No 207, March 1981 ( 88 - 99 )
    		278.
  278. Interim Report - Report No 194, June 1979 ( 212 - 227 )
    		279.
  279. Case No 845 (Canada) - Complaint date: 23-APR-76THE INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF FREE TEACHERS' UNIONS
  280. Definitive Report - Report No 164, June 1977 ( 33 - 44 )
    		281.
  281. Case No 841 (Canada) - Complaint date: 18-FEB-76THE CANADIAN WORKERS' UNION
  282. Definitive Report - Report No 168, November 1977 ( 151 - 162 )
    		283.
  283. Interim Report - Report No 160, March 1977 ( 333 - 393 )
    		284.
  284. Case No 818 (Canada) - Complaint date: 24-JUN-75THE CANADIAN LABOUR CONGRESS
  285. Definitive Report - Report No 158, November 1976 ( 172 - 235 )
    		286.
  286. Case No 746 (Canada) - Complaint date: 19-JAN-73THE INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF FREE TEACHERS' UNIONS AND THE WORLD CONFEDERATION OF LABOUR
  287. Definitive Report - Report No 139, 1974 ( 336 - 374 )
    		288.
  288. Case No 699 (Canada) - Complaint date: 10-MAY-72World Confederation of Labour, the International Federation of Employees in Public Service and the World Confederation of Teachers
  289. Definitive Report - Report No 133, 1972 ( 142 - 196 )
    		290.
  290. Interim Report - Report No 131, 1972 ( 203 - 216 )
    		291.
  291. Case No 523 (Canada) - Complaint date: 18-MAY-67Canadian Labour Congress
  292. Report in which the committee requests to be kept informed of development - Report No 110, 1969 ( 88 - 98 )
    		293.
  293. Interim Report - Report No 106, 1968 ( 20 - 45 )
    		294.
  294. Case No 211 (Canada) - Complaint date: 02-NOV-59The Canadian Labour Congress and the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions
  295. Definitive Report - Report No 72, 1964 ( 17 - 28 )
    		296.
  296. Interim Report - Report No 60, 1962 ( 68 - 74 )
    		297.
  297. Interim Report - Report No 56, 1961 ( 141 - 145 )
    		298.
  298. Interim Report - Report No 49, 1961 ( 197 - 253 )
    		299.
  299. Interim Report - Report No 45, 1960 ( 82 - 116 )
    		300.
  300. Case No 171 (Canada) - Complaint date: 11-JAN-58The International Federation of Christian Trade Unions
  301. Definitive Report - Report No 30, 1960 ( 40 - 45 )
    		302.
© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer