ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards

Solicitud directa (CEACR) - Adopción: 1992, Publicación: 79ª reunión CIT (1992)

Convenio sobre la protección de los cargadores de muelle contra los accidentes (revisado), 1932 (núm. 32) - China (Ratificación : 1935)

Otros comentarios sobre C032

Solicitud directa
  1. 2020
  2. 2012
  3. 2007
  4. 2005
  5. 1998
  6. 1992
  7. 1990

Visualizar en: Francés - EspañolVisualizar todo

1. The Committee noted from the Government's report that each port authority laid down regulations for its own use. The Committee requested the Government to supply the texts in question so that it might satisfy itself that the Convention was being applied.

In its latest report, the Government repeats that the regulations of each port are in conformity with the Convention. It also states that, if Convention No. 32 was revised, it would be possible to consider preparing unified national regulations in conformity with the new Convention.

The Committee draws the Government's attention to the Convention concerning Occupational Safety and Health in Dock Work, 1979, which is a revised version of Convention No. 32.

2. The Committee asks the Government to indicate how the application of the following provisions of the Convention is ensured: Article 2 (condition of regular approaches over a dock, wharf, quay or similar premises used by workers); Article 3 (means of access to ships: their dimensions, construction and condition and the method of securing them); Article 5 (means of access to the holds of ships when processes are being carried on in them); Article 6 (measures for the protection of hatchways and all other openings on board a ship); Article 8 (safety measures for workers when engaged in removing or replacing hatch coverings); Article 9, paragraph 2(3) (annealing of chains and similar gear carried on board ship or not carried on board ship); Article 9, paragraph 2(6) (fencing of motors, cogwheels, chain and friction gearing and live electric conductors); Article 9, paragraph 2(7) (means with which cranes and winches must be provided to reduce to a minimum the risk of the accidental descent of a load); Article 9, paragraph 2(8) (measures to prevent exhaust steam from obscuring any part of the working place); Article 9, paragraph 2(9) (measures to prevent the foot of a derrick being accidentally lifted out of its socket or support); Article 11, paragraph (4) (procedure for beginning work at a hatch); Article 11, paragraph (5) (precautions to facilitate the escape of the workers when dealing with bulk cargo); Article 11, paragraph (6) (use of stages in various processes); Article 11, paragraph (7) (use of gear in a hold when the working space is confined the the square of the hatch); Article 11, paragraph (9) (use of an automatic indicator or a table showing the safe working loads for shore cranes); Article 13, (first-aid facilities and equipment at docks, wharves, quays and similar places; provision for the rescue of immersed workers from drowning); Article 14 (prohibition of the removal of or interference with any means of access or life-saving means by unauthorised persons); Article 16 (obligation to apply the provisions of the Convention to ships the building of which is commenced after the date of ratification); and Article 18 (undertaking by the member State to enter into reciprocal arrangements with other Members which have ratified the Convention).

3. Article 9, paragraph 2(2) and (4). Since the expression "in accordance with the usual standards of maintenance" is fairly widespread in the regulations supplied by the Government - it is used in the provisions of Chapter II, paragraph 1, Chapter IX, paragraph 2, Chapter X, paragraph 2, and others, and in the safety rules for the use of mobile loading and unloading gear and appliances - the Committee asks the Government to explain what this expression implies and to state whether the keeping of a record is mandatory during the inspection prescribed by the provisions in question.

4. Article 17. In view of the importance of due enforcement of the Convention in practice, the Committee asks the Government to indicate what system of inspection is in existence in the country, what penalties are prescribed in accordance with paragraph (2) of this Article for breaches of the regulations, and what measures are taken to ensure that copies or summaries of the regulations are posted up in prominent positions at places which are in use for the processes, in accordance with paragraph (3) of this Article.

5. The Committee informs the Government with reference to the suggestion it makes in its report that the Occupational Safety and Health (Dock Work) Convention (No. 152) was adopted by the International Labour Conference at its 65th Session, in 1979, as an instrument revising this Convention. That gives the Government an opportunity to examine the question of preparing unified national standards on the subject.

© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer