Solicitud directa (CEACR) - Adopción: 2002, Publicación: 91ª reunión CIT (2003)

Convenio sobre el trabajo forzoso, 1930 (núm. 29) - Federación de Rusia (Ratificación : 1956)
Protocolo de 2014 relativo al Convenio sobre el trabajo forzoso, 1930 - Federación de Rusia (Ratificación : 2019)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report contains no reply to previous comments. It hopes that the next report will include full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

Freedom of career military personnel to leave the service.  The Committee previously noted the Government’s statement that the armed forces of the country now engage their military personnel completely on the basis of employment contracts, except the persons drafted for compulsory military service, and that warrant officers and petty officers as well as rank and file personnel perform their duties on the basis of fixed-term contracts concluded for a period of three to five years. It notes Decree No. 722, of 16 May 1996, of the President of the Russian Federation (as amended by Decree No. 1356, of 11 November 1998) with respect to the transition to staffing military posts with citizens entering military service under contract, as well as Decree No. 4, of 4 November 1999, of the President of the Russian Federation with respect to matters relating to the performance of military service under contract, supplied by the Government with its latest report.

The Committee notes that, under Decree No. 4, the right to define the procedure for concluding and drawing up contracts resides with the Ministry of Defence. The Committee notes that a portion of Order No. 99 was attached to the Government’s report but requests the Government to supply, with its next report, a full text of Order No. 99, of 11 March 1999, of the Minister of Defence of the Russian Federation regarding the provisional procedure for the conclusion of contracts for military service by citizens of the Russian Federation, the appointment of servicemen to military posts and their removal from military posts, the assignment of military rank and discharge from military service.

Prison labour.  The Committee notes that the Government’s report contains no reply to its previous comments on the subject. It hopes that the next report will include full information on the following matters raised in its previous direct request:

The Committee previously noted that section 37 of the Correctional Labour Code, as amended on 12 June 1992, provides that every convicted person is under an obligation to work, such work being exacted from them by the administration of correctional institutions either at state enterprises, or at enterprises of other forms of ownership, on a contract basis. It also noted the provision of section 21 of Act No. 5473-1, of 21 July 1993, on the institutions and bodies for the execution of sentences involving deprivation of freedom, according to which compulsory labour may be exacted from convicted prisoners at enterprises of any organizational or legal form, even if such enterprises do not belong to the executive penal system and are located out of the place of correctional institutions; compulsory labour is exacted in this case on the basis of a contract concluded between the administration of institutions for the execution of sentences and the enterprises concerned.

The Committee recalls in this connection that Article 2, paragraph 2(c), of the Convention exempts from its provisions "any work or service exacted from any person as a consequence of a conviction in a court of law, provided that the said work or service is carried out under the supervision and control of a public authority and that the said person is not hired to or placed at the disposal of private individuals, companies or associations". While this Article strictly prohibits that prisoners be hired to or placed at the disposal of private undertakings, the Committee has accepted, for the reasons set out in paragraphs 97 to 101 of its 1979 General Survey on the abolition of forced labour, that schemes existing in certain countries under which prisoners may, particularly during the period preceding their release, voluntarily enter a normal employment relationship with private employers, do not fall within the scope of the Convention. As the Committee has repeatedly pointed out only work performed in conditions of a free employment relationship can be held compatible with the explicit prohibition in Article 2, paragraph 2(c); this necessarily requires the formal consentof the person concerned and, in the light of the circumstances of the consent, i.e. the basic obligation to perform prison labour, and other restrictions on the prisoner’s freedom to take up normal employment, there must be further guarantees and safeguards covering the  essential elements of a labour relation, such as a level of wages and social security corresponding to a free labour relationship, to remove the employment from the scope of Article 2, paragraph 2(c), which unconditionally prohibits that persons who are under an obligation to perform prison labour be hired to or placed at the disposal of private companies.

The Committee reiterates its hope that, taking into account these considerations, the Government will take the necessary measures in relation to the abovementioned legislation to ensure the observance of the Convention, and that it will provide, in its next report, information on law and practice regarding the work of prisoners for private enterprises.