Judgment No. 231
Decision
THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED AS IRRECEIVABLE.
Considerations
Extract:
"According to Article II, paragraph 5, of its Statute the Tribunal hears complaints drawn up against organisations which have recognised its competence and alleging non-observance of terms of appointment or the provisions of staff regulations."
Reference(s)
ILOAT reference: ARTICLE II, PARAGRAPH 5, OF THE STATUTE
Keywords
competence of tribunal; iloat statute; staff regulations and rules; enforcement; contract
Considerations
Extract:
The complainant was seconded by NORAD to GATT, an organisation which has recognised the competence of the Tribunal. He did not conclude a contract of appointment with GATT and was not subject to its Staff Regulations. His contract merely stated that he was subject to the latter organisation's working conditions.
Keywords
locus standi; status of complainant; competence of tribunal; right of appeal; staff regulations and rules; secondment; contract; consequence; non official
|