ILO

Back to index

Improving Indigenous peoples’ access to justice and development through community-based monitoring - Final evaluation

eval_number:

3526

eval_url:

https://webapps.ilo.org/ievaldiscovery/eval/3526

location:

country:

Inter-Regional

region:

Inter-Regional

---

eval_title:

Improving Indigenous peoples’ access to justice and development through community-based monitoring - Final evaluation

recommendations:

date:

2023-02-20 00:00:00.0

themes:

theme:

Conditions of work & equality

category:

Indigenous people

---

action_plan:

GEDI will continue to address indigenous peoples issues within its technical mandate as well as promote mainstreaming of indigenous issues across the ILO's activities via its role in promoting gender equality and non-discrimination as a cross-cutting policy driver. GEDI will continue to allocate available resources to technical work on indigenous peoples' issues, in including collaborative work with indigenous partners.

management_response:

Completed

progress:

Achieved

admin_units:

GED

title:

4 Mainstreaming IP Issues and Increasing IP Participation in the Governance of the ILO: Further mainstreaming of IP issues is required within the ILO to breakdown silos and ensure that all branches and country offices are fully informed about, attuned to and allocate their in-country financial and human resources appropriately to address IPs rights and sustainable development issues. In particular the ILO’s GEDI Branch should seek funding to ensure that ILO country offices have sufficient resources to provide technical and networking support to IN consortium partners in each of the IN target countries. Furthermore, given that IPs rights and development have been an important element of the ILO’s programmes almost since its founding, as well as the UN Secretary Generals recent call for a radical rethinking of global economic and governance structures to address the Triple Planetary Crisis, the ILO should seriously consider possible institutional arrangements to ensure that IPs have a greater voice within the ILO’s governance structures and planning mechanisms. Potential approaches might include establishing advisory committees to represent the interests of IPs and other marginalized groups. Countries such as in Bolivia or the Philippines, where the national governments have demonstrated a stronger interest in engaging IPs in socio-political discourse, it may be possible to establish novel approaches to mainstreaming and amplifying IP voices through the ILO governance arrangements.

project_symbols:

GLO/16/24/EUR

url:

https://webapps.ilo.org/ievaldiscovery/recommendations/16551

information_source:

Head Quarters

---