Judgment No. 2276
Decision
1. The impugned decision is set aside. 2. The complainant is entitled to the full amount of the non-resident allowance without gradual reduction. 3. The Organization shall pay the complainant the sum of 5,000 Swiss francs in costs.
Consideration 4
Extract:
When it comes to interpretation, the primary rule is that words are to be given their obvious and ordinary meaning (see Judgment 1222, under 4) and any ambiguity in a provision should be construed in favour of staff and not of the Organization (see Judgment 1755, under 12).
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 1222, 1755
Keywords
interpretation; interpretation of rules
|