Judgment No. 240

• Organization: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
• Date: 21.10.1974
• Original: French
• Judges: Devlin, Letourneur, Grisel
• Full judgment text - Full judgment text (french)

Decision

1. There is no reason to consider the request for interpretation.
2. Mr. Hopkirk's accessory claims for relief are dismissed.

Considerations

Extract:

"[The judgment in question] is clear, suffers from no ambiguity and presents no difficulty of interpretation. The Tribunal therefore sees no reason to interpret that judgment."

Reference(s)

ILOAT Judgment(s): 211

Keywords

application for interpretation

Considerations

Extract:

"A request for interpretation of a judgment by the Administrative Tribunal is receivable only if the operative part of the judgment gives rise to uncertainty or ambiguity about its meaning or purport."

Reference(s)

ILOAT Judgment(s): 211

Keywords

application for interpretation; receivability of the complaint; condition