Judgment No. 2978
Decision
The complaint is dismissed.
Consideration 4
Extract:
"[A]ccording to the Tribunal's case law, when the result of a competition is announced and, more broadly when [...] the Administration chooses between candidates, the duty to state the reasons for the choice does not mean that they must be notified at the same time as the decision (see Judgments 1787, under 5, and 2035, under 4). These reasons may be disclosed at a later date, for example in the context of appeal proceedings (see Judgments 1590, under 7, and 2194, under 7)."
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 1590, 1787, 2035, 2194
Keywords
decision; duty to substantiate decision; grounds; formal requirements; date of notification; appointment; competition; candidate; discretion
Consideration 6
Extract:
"[T]he mere fact that one of the candidates in a competition is temporarily holding the post to be filled does not render the procedure unlawful."
Keywords
provisional measures; competition; candidate; procedural flaw
|