Judgment No. 4333

• Organization: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
• Date: 07.12.2020
• Original: English
• Judges: Frydman, Barbagallo, Rawlins
• Full judgment text - Full judgment text (french)

Decision

1. The impugned decision is set aside to the extent that it confirmed that the complainant’s effective EOD date under her fixed-term appointment was 15 January 2016.
2. The FAO shall pay the complainant salary and all related benefits due to her for the period 1 January to 14 January 2016.
3. For the purpose of the complainant’s within-grade step increment, the FAO shall consider that 1 January 2016 was her EOD date under a fixed-term appointment.
4. The FAO shall pay the complainant 1,500 euros in costs.
5. All other claims are dismissed.

Summary

The complainant challenges her effective entry on duty (EOD) date under a fixed-term appointment.

Judgment keywords

Keywords

complaint allowed; decision quashed; contract; entry on duty