Judgment No. 904
Decision
THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED.
Consideration 3
Extract:
"When the complainant was appointed, he was living in England and was paid removal expenses as head of family because at the time he had a dependent daughter. [...] Since the complainant no longer has any dependants and is divorced [...] he is entitled to the cost of removing only 40 cubic meters of personal effects".
Keywords
dependant; removal expenses; separation from service
Consideration 4
Extract:
"There is no evidence submitted by the complainant to suggest that the amount provided for travel expenses was inadequate. The claim therefore fails."
Keywords
amount; evidence; burden of proof; travel expenses
Summary
Extract:
According to the CIPEC Staff Regulations, a reinstallation allowance is payable in an amount equivalent to a certain number of weeks' remuneration. The complainant served on a part-time basis. The Tribunal holds that it was proper for this to enter into the reckoning of the allowance.
Keywords
reckoning; part-time employment; repatriation allowance
Summary
Extract:
Annual leave is proportional to the amount of service. The complainant served on a part-time basis. The Tribunal holds that it was proper for this to enter into the reckoning of accrued leave.
Keywords
reckoning; part-time employment; annual leave; commutation of accrued leave
|