Promotion (269, 270, 271, 945, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281, 666,-666)
You searched for:
Keywords: Promotion
Total judgments found: 169
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 | next >
Judgment 4040
126th Session, 2018
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant challenges the rejection of her request for the reclassification of her post.
Consideration 2
Extract:
[T]he Tribunal has no competence to order an organisation to promote a staff member (see, for example, Judgment 3370, consideration 8).
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 3370
Keywords:
order; promotion;
Judgment 4026
126th Session, 2018
International Atomic Energy Agency
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant challenges the decision not to reclassify her post.
Considerations 13-14
Extract:
The Tribunal stated the following, in Judgment 3102, consideration 7:
“[E]ven if a staff member may claim no right to promotion, promotion procedures must be conducted with due diligence and as swiftly as the normal workings of an administration permit. There is nothing to justify delaying for years a promotion which the staff member may legitimately expect and which naturally has a direct impact on his or her career prospects, unless this delay may be attributed to a fault on the part of the person concerned during the procedure (see Judgment 2706, under 11 and 12).”
[...]The reclassification process took too long and the IAEA’s explanation for the delay is unconvincing.
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 2706, 3102
Keywords:
delay; promotion;
Judgment 4024
126th Session, 2018
International Atomic Energy Agency
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant challenges the decision not to reclassify her post.
Considerations 10-11
Extract:
The Tribunal stated the following, in Judgment 3102, consideration 7:
“[E]ven if a staff member may claim no right to promotion, promotion procedures must be conducted with due diligence and as swiftly as the normal workings of an administration permit. There is nothing to justify delaying for years a promotion which the staff member may legitimately expect and which naturally has a direct impact on his or her career prospects, unless this delay may be attributed to a fault on the part of the person concerned during the procedure (see Judgment 2706, under 11 and 12).”
[...] The reclassification process took too long and the IAEA’s explanation for the delay is unconvincing.
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 2706, 3102
Keywords:
delay; promotion;
Judgment 4019
126th Session, 2018
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant challenges the decision not to grant her a promotion in the 2013 promotion exercise.
Consideration 2
Extract:
The Tribunal has consistently held that staff promotions by an international organisation are decisions which lie within the discretion of its executive head. Such a decision is therefore subject to only limited review by the Tribunal, which will interfere only if the decision was taken without authority, if a rule of form or procedure was breached, if it was based on a mistake of fact or of law, if an essential fact was overlooked, if a clearly mistaken conclusion was drawn from the facts, or if there was abuse of authority (see, for example, Judgments 2834, under 7, 3006, under 7, or 3742, under 3).
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 2834, 3006, 3742
Keywords:
discretion; judicial review; promotion;
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint allowed; decision quashed; promotion;
Consideration 11
Extract:
The setting aside of this decision does not, in itself, imply that the complainant would actually have been promoted if the proper procedure had been followed. Nevertheless, as her immediate supervisor had submitted a very complimentary promotion proposal, which would normally have been supported by her second-level supervisor, the procedural flaw identified above unduly deprived her of a promotion opportunity. This lost opportunity constitutes material injury which, as the complainant rightly submits, entitles her to compensation (see, for example, Judgments 2869, under 10, or 3084, under 21).
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 2869, 3084
Keywords:
loss of opportunity; material injury; promotion;
Judgment 4017
126th Session, 2018
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainants challenge the decisions not to promote them during the 2014 promotion exercise.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint dismissed; promotion;
Consideration 4
Extract:
The Tribunal considers that, although the Organisation may not lawfully preclude any possibility of promotion year after year for officials who have reached the top of their grade bracket, since as stated in the above-mentioned judgments the Staff Regulations make provision for such promotions in exceptional cases, it was open to it to decide once more that they could not be granted by the Director General in the 2014 promotion exercise.
Keywords:
promotion;
Judgment 3877
124th Session, 2017
World Intellectual Property Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant challenges the date on which her retroactive promotion took effect.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint dismissed; promotion;
Judgment 3870
124th Session, 2017
World Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant alleges that he was promised promotion to grade D-2.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
case sent back to organisation; complaint allowed; decision quashed; promise; promotion;
Judgment 3776
123rd Session, 2017
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant contests the decision preventing her from receiving a merit-based increment.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint dismissed; promotion;
Judgment 3773
123rd Session, 2017
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant disputes the calculation of the number of years of service taken into consideration to determine the date on which she became eligible for personal promotion.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint allowed; promotion;
Judgment 3771
123rd Session, 2017
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant contends that the ILO misled her concerning the personal promotion system.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint dismissed; promotion;
Judgment 3767
123rd Session, 2017
ITER International Fusion Energy Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant challenges the decision to delay the grant of a periodic step advancement based on his 2012 performance appraisal report.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint allowed; promotion;
Judgment 3730
123rd Session, 2017
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant contends that Eurocontrol withdrew his title and duties as Head of Section.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint allowed; promotion;
Judgment 3667
122nd Session, 2016
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant challenges the fact that he was not promoted during the 2013 promotion exercise.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint dismissed; promotion;
Judgment 3666
122nd Session, 2016
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant contests the decision not to promote him in 2012.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint dismissed; promotion;
Judgment 3664
122nd Session, 2016
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant challenges the fact that she was not promoted during the 2013 promotion exercise.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint dismissed; promotion;
Judgment 3659
122nd Session, 2016
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant challenges the fact that she was not promoted in the 2013 promotion exercise.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint dismissed; promotion;
Judgment 3657
122nd Session, 2016
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant challenges the fact that he was not promoted in the 2013 promotion exercise.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint dismissed; promotion;
Judgment 3655
122nd Session, 2016
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant challenges the fact that she was not promoted in the 2013 promotion exercise.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint dismissed; promotion;
Judgment 3572
121st Session, 2016
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant challenges his non-inclusion in the list of staff members eligible for promotion in 2013.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint dismissed; promotion;
Judgment 3535
120th Session, 2015
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: In his two complaints, the complainant challenges the effective date of his promotion.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint allowed; decision quashed; joinder; promotion;
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 | next >
|
