Co-defendant (21,-666)

You searched for:
Keywords: Co-defendant
Total judgments found: 4

• Judgment 2872

  
  108th Session, 2010
  United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 3

  Extract:

  Application for execution of Judgment 2616.
  The complainant requested inter alia that the UNJSPF be made a party to the proceeding. The Tribunal rejected that request on the grounds that the UNJSPF is not subject to its jurisdiction.
  "In addition to his application for execution of Judgment 2616, the complainant asks that the UNJSPF be added as a co defendant in this proceeding and that it be held jointly responsible with UNESCO for the consequences stemming from the delay in payment of the pension benefits. This request is rejected. The UNJSPF is not subject to the Tribunal's jurisdiction and, therefore, cannot be made a party to this proceeding. As well, even if the Fund were subject to the Tribunal's jurisdiction, the proceeding concerns the execution of a judgment against UNESCO and not the Fund."

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT Judgment(s): 2616
  

  Keywords:

  co-defendant; competence of tribunal; iloat statute; unjspf;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 1049

  
  69th Session, 1990
  World Health Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Summary

  Extract:

  The complainants object to the results of a competition concerning a post for which they were candidates. The Tribunal invited the official who was appointed to the vacancy to submit a brief on the matter.

  Keywords:

  application for quashing; co-defendant; competition;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 177

  
  26th Session, 1971
  United International Bureaux for the Protection of Intellectual Property
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 1

  Extract:

  WIPO has replaced BIRPI. "All BIRPI officials became WIPO officials, and the liabilities of BIRPI are assumed by WIPO as and when the member states of the former organisation join the new one. [...] BIRPI and WIPO are joint respondents in the present case."

  Keywords:

  co-defendant;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 174

  
  26th Session, 1971
  Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Preamble

  Extract:

  The complainant contests an appointment made to fill a vacancy. The person appointed to the post is regarded as co-defendant. "Considering [...] the observations made by [Mr X] who was notified of the complaint on the decision of the President of the Tribunal[...]"

  Keywords:

  appointment; candidate; co-defendant; selection procedure; vacancy;