|
|
 |
|
|
Penalty for delay (676,-666)
You searched for:
Keywords: Penalty for delay
Total judgments found: 8
Judgment 3688
122nd Session, 2016
World Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant challenges the decision to abolish her post and to separate her from service.
Consideration 32
Extract:
These sums should be paid to [the complainant] within 30 days of the date of delivery of this judgment, failing which they shall bear interest at the rate of 5 per cent per annum from that date until the date of payment.
Keywords:
penalty for delay;
Judgment 3654
122nd Session, 2016
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant challenges the decision to maintain on his personal file a disputed performance appraisal report issued after the expiry of his temporary appointment, and the decision to reject his application for inclusion on a roster of candidates eligible for temporary contracts.
Consideration 10
Extract:
[The] sums should be paid within 28 days of the date of delivery of this judgment, failing which they shall bear interest at the rate of 5 per cent per annum from that date until the date of payment.
Keywords:
penalty for delay;
Judgment 3635
122nd Session, 2016
Centre for the Development of Enterprise
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainants have filed applications for execution of Judgment 3238.
Consideration 15
Extract:
In light of the lack of speed which the CDE has displayed so far in dealing with this case, it is appropriate to order it to pay each complainant a penalty of 3,000 euros per month of delay if it does not honour its obligations in full within 30 days of the delivery in public of this judgment.
Keywords:
penalty for delay;
Judgment 1362
77th Session, 1994
World Intellectual Property Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 10
Extract:
"[T]he Tribunal must rule yet again on WIPO's refusal to discharge the obligation to decide on reinstatement. As it has stated more than once, its judgments are to be given immediate effect. In the regrettable event that the Organization continues to disregard that rule and fails to act within 30 days of the date of delivery of this judgment, it must pay the complainant 10,000 swiss francs by way of penalty for each further month of delay."
Keywords:
amount; application for execution; continuing breach; decision; delay; execution of judgment; general principle; judgment of the tribunal; organisation's duties; penalty for delay; refusal; reinstatement; res judicata; time limit;
Judgment 1338
77th Session, 1994
World Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Considerations 11-12
Extract:
"An organisation must, where a specific sum has been awarded [by the Tribunal], pay compensation if it takes more than one month to pay after the judgment was notified, save that if, as in Judgment 1219, the Tribunal does not put a figure on the amount due, the need to work out the figure warrants allowing additional time. In this instance [...] apart from alleging the need for consultations the Organization has offered no explanation for the delay in payment. The Tribunal therefore awards the complainant payment of interest".
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 1219
Keywords:
administrative delay; amount; application for execution; delay; execution of judgment; formal demand for payment; interest on damages; judgment of the tribunal; organisation's duties; payment; penalty for delay; res judicata; time limit;
Judgment 706
57th Session, 1985
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 10
Extract:
"The complainant is also entitled to interest at 10 per cent a year on the sums due under this judgment from 3 May 1984, the date on which he asked UNESCO to execute Judgment 607 and from which there was a demand to pay."
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 607
Keywords:
amount; application for execution; date; execution of judgment; formal demand for payment; interest on damages; judgment of the tribunal; payment; penalty for delay;
Consideration 10
Extract:
The organization failed to give proper effect to Judgment 607. The complainant wins his case. He is entitled to interest on the amounts due him from the date on which he asked UNESCO to execute Judgment 607 and from which there was a demand to pay.
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 607
Keywords:
date; delay in payment; execution of judgment; formal demand for payment; interest on damages; judgment of the tribunal; payment; penalty for delay;
Judgment 553
50th Session, 1983
World Tourism Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Considerations 1-2
Extract:
The material judgment was immediately operative. "The complainant seeks, and is entitled to, payment of interest in compensation for the damage he has suffered through the [organisation's] delay in giving effect to the judgment".
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 463
Keywords:
administrative delay; application for execution; execution of judgment; injury; interest on damages; judgment of the tribunal; penalty for delay;
Judgment 82
14th Session, 1965
International Telecommunication Union
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 10
Extract:
The complainant "is entitled to an indemnity compensating him for the damage he has suffered through the delay on the part of [the organisation] in giving effect to [...] the operative part of the [...] judgment [in question]." It emerges from the dossier that this damage will be equitably remedied by deciding that the sum which the organisation must pay - and the amount of which had been fixed by order - shall bear interest at the rate of 5 per cent, payable as from the thirtieth day after notification of the said order.
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 61
Keywords:
administrative delay; amount; execution of judgment; injury; interest on damages; judgment of the tribunal; penalty for delay;
|
|
|
|
|
