Actuary (895,-666)

You searched for:
Keywords: Actuary
Total judgments found: 3

• Judgment 4580

  
  135th Session, 2023
  International Bureau of Weights and Measures
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainants challenge the increase in their contributions to the Pension and Provident Fund such as it appears on their payslips for January 2021.

  Consideration 19

  Extract:

  [T]he Tribunal reiterates, in respect of the supposed “flimsiness” of the actuarial studies at issue, that it is not its role to substitute its assessment for that of an expert such as an actuary unless that assessment is affected by a blatant error (see [...] Judgments 4278 and 4277, considerations 16 and 20 respectively, and the case law cited therein). The complainants’ line of argument regarding these studies, which consists in drawing attention to the hypothetical nature of particular data used therein – which the very nature of such studies makes inevitable – does not establish the existence of such a blatant error.

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT Judgment(s): 4277, 4278
  

  Keywords:

  actuary; discretion; expert inquiry; judicial review;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 4277

  
  130th Session, 2020
  International Bureau of Weights and Measures
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainant, who has been receiving a retirement pension since 1 December 2017, impugns her “pay slip” for January 2018.

  Consideration 20

  Extract:

  As the Tribunal recalled in Judgment 3538 (under 15), the power clearly vested in the competent authority to alter the pension scheme can be exercised lawfully if it represents a bona fide attempt to secure the pension scheme into the future and is based on what appears to be properly reasoned actuarial advice.

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT Judgment(s): 3538
  

  Keywords:

  actuary; good faith; pension; sustainability;
  

  Consideration 20

  Extract:

  As a rule, the Tribunal will not substitute its own assessment for that of an expert such as an actuary (see Judgments 3360, under 4 and 5, 3538, under 11 to 15, and 4134, under 26). However, since the complainant alleges blatant errors, the Tribunal will examine her objections.

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT Judgment(s): 3360, 3538, 4134
  

  Keywords:

  actuary; expert inquiry; judicial review; manifest error;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 1406

  
  78th Session, 1995
  World Health Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 7

  Extract:

  The complainant wants the Tribunal to hold hearings and call witnesses "if it needs proof of any facts. Since the WHO has produced further evidence, there is no need for such hearings. Moreover, the disclosure of that evidence satisfies the Tribunal that there has been due process."

  Keywords:

  actuary; adversarial proceedings; disclosure of evidence; due process; oral proceedings;