ILO

Back to index

Supporting the Time-Bound Programme against WFCL in South Africa and laying the basis for concerted action in Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia and Swaziland - Final Evaluation

eval_number:

1000

eval_url:

https://webapps.ilo.org/ievaldiscovery/eval/1000

lessons_learned:

themes:

theme:

Programme implementation

category:

Organizational issues

---

comments:

N/A

challenges:

N/A

success:

N/A

context:

N/A

description:

While it is often difficult in development work to assign attribution to only one source, in a project like this the issue of attribution is important. This links to the question of defining if a programme is there to facilitate or to implement. The lines between these were sometimes blurred, hence attribution became blurred. It is quite obvious that a programme could fulfil a variety of roles and that it is not mutually exclusive. So TECL could facilitate some processes and implement others. In the case of TECL I some government respondents were concerned that TECL was implementing rather than facilitating. The principle, therefore, is to clarify the role that the programme is meant to play and to be open about communicate these to all stakeholders concerned.

administrative_issues:

N/A

url:

https://webapps.ilo.org/ievaldiscovery/lessons/157990

---

location:

country:

Africa - regional

region:

Africa

---

eval_title:

Supporting the Time-Bound Programme against WFCL in South Africa and laying the basis for concerted action in Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia and Swaziland - Final Evaluation