ILO

Back to index

Tripartite action to protect migrants from labour exploitation (ASEAN TRIANGLE) - Midterm evaluation

eval_number:

1830

eval_url:

https://webapps.ilo.org/ievaldiscovery/eval/1830

lessons_learned:

themes:

theme:

Tripartism & constituent partnerships

category:

Organizational issues

---

comments:

Targeted users / Beneficiaries: government officials

challenges:

N/A

success:

The focus on key sectors (fishing, domestic work) already targeted by the GMS TRIANGLE project has generated further attention of government officials (and other constituents), also under pressure to fall in line with the requirements of the ASEAN Declaration on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Migrant Workers

context:

Progress with regard to the legal framework has been possible thanks to the commitment of ASEC and to the contribution and commitment of all parties involved (the declared intentions of government officials to follow-up on recommendations of AFML meetings substantiate this). Ownership of the project activities and commitment to achieve results are real. This was not only confirmed by statements made to the evaluator, but by concrete facts (e.g. follow-up meetings related to the fishing sector, interest of employers’ and workers’ organizations to implement the work plan on capacity development supported by the project)

description:

The commitment of all partners is central to achieve sizeable results for the benefit of migrant workers

administrative_issues:

ILO Country offices and NPCs have played a major role in ensuring the follow-up of activities organized by the project in further “coaching” government officials to take further action on the recommendations generated from the events. This particularly applies to Indonesia.

url:

https://webapps.ilo.org/ievaldiscovery/lessons/192697

---

location:

country:

Asia and the Pacific - regional

region:

Asia and the Pacific

---

eval_title:

Tripartite action to protect migrants from labour exploitation (ASEAN TRIANGLE) - Midterm evaluation