Back to index
Typhoon Bopha Philppines: Joint response to post-calamity interventions, local resource based employment generation and livelihood recovery Final Evaluation
- eval_number:
- 2214
- eval_url:
- https://webapps.ilo.org/ievaldiscovery/eval/2214
- lessons_learned:
- themes:
- theme:
- Economic reconstruction
- category:
- Economic and social development
- comments:
- N/A
- challenges:
- The ILO administrative system not prepared for quick operations
Delays in project implementation can have implications to the approach of the interventions and in situating the project within the timelines of the local action plans.
If local governments are strong, governments active involvement can be alternative or parallel to community contracting
- success:
- EIIP is an Effective approach
It is important to align the interventions to local action plans and to develop local leadership, commitment and motivation
- context:
- The project alignment with the strategic thrusts of the Local Government Units is seen to guarantee success and sustainability.
The same area of intervention with the same inputs can have different outputs or outcomes depending on the contextual or structural factors - (Example different locations of SALT)
Community contracting is useful when local government does not have enough capacities.
- description:
- The ILO EIIP approach, even if innovative, can be effective with correct support from the local governments. Community contracting complemented with local governments active monitoring and participation is a correct approach.
- administrative_issues:
- ILO Administrative system must respond in the short term
ILO administrative systems and procedures must consider the exigency required for projects that are humanitarian in context.
- url:
- https://webapps.ilo.org/ievaldiscovery/lessons/210461
- location:
- country:
- Philippines
- region:
- Asia and the Pacific
- eval_title:
- Typhoon Bopha Philppines: Joint response to post-calamity interventions, local resource based employment generation and livelihood recovery Final Evaluation
Skip to top
