Back to index
Measurement, awareness-raising and policy management (MAP) project on child labour and forced labour in support of SDG target 8.7 - Midterm evaluation
- eval_number:
- 2671
- eval_url:
- https://webapps.ilo.org/ievaldiscovery/eval/2671
- good_practices:
- replication:
- -
- cause_effect:
- .
- themes:
- theme:
- Child labour
- category:
- Child labour, forced labour, human trafficking and slavery
- context:
- -
- description:
- MAP 16 project has enabled the development of the Hazardous Child Labour List for the first time in Montenegro. The Hazardous Child Labour List has been developed in consultation with 25 members of the technical working group, with a high agreement among the members. As a member of the technical working group, the Ombudsman representative initiated the consultative process with the children advisers to get their opinion on the
draft of the Hazardous Child Labour List.
Namely, the Golden Advisors’ Network, which consists of 12 members aged 11-17, was established in 2014 to enable children’s participation in Ombudsman’s work. The Hazardous Child Labour List draft was shared with the children-advisors, and the Ombudsman representative presented opinions of child advisors at the meeting of the technical working group. The document review and stakeholder interviews confirmed that most of the children’s recommendations were adopted, such as the request to eliminate fishery, cultivation of aromatic and spicy herbs, cosmetics, and body care, from the list of hazardous labour. Besides, children supported the need for adding child begging on the list.
This presents a good practice for children's voice to be heard during the
development of legislation relevant to protect children.
- links:
- -
- indicators:
- -
- url:
- https://webapps.ilo.org/ievaldiscovery/practices/229747
- location:
- country:
- Inter-Regional
- region:
- Inter-Regional
- eval_title:
- Measurement, awareness-raising and policy management (MAP) project on child labour and forced labour in support of SDG target 8.7 - Midterm evaluation
Skip to top