ILO

Back to index

Inclusive Growth, Social Protection and Jobs (Implementation Phase II) - Final evaluation

eval_number:

3442

eval_url:

https://webapps.ilo.org/ievaldiscovery/eval/3442

location:

country:

Inter-Regional

region:

Inter-Regional

---

eval_title:

Inclusive Growth, Social Protection and Jobs (Implementation Phase II) - Final evaluation

recommendations:

date:

2023-02-09 00:00:00.0

themes:

theme:

Organizational issues

category:

Planning and programme design

---

action_plan:

- The Partnership Programme outcomes are aligned with the ILO’s Global Flagship Programme Strategy for 2021-25 and the ILO’s Programme and Budget 2022-23 - As mentioned above, the results framework of the new PRODOC is exclusively focused on the progressive achievement of universal social protection, and the outcomes and outputs of each country component are built on a similar structure and logic, which on the one hand clarifies the overall progression of the project by outcome, but also facilitates the cross-cutting objectives of knowledge sharing and capacity building in a way that reinforces synergies through thematic convergence, which is the core objective of the coordination and learning hub. - During the inception phase, each country will establish outcome targets and high-level indicators - For those countries included as part of the Global Accelerator on Jobs and Social Protection for Just Transitions (Viet Nam and Malawi), additional targets and indicators may be added in line with the Theory of Change and M&E framework of the Accelerator.

management_response:

Partially Completed

progress:

Partially achieved

admin_units:

SOCPRO

title:

2. Consider streamlining Programme outcomes, and within each outcome establish country targets and high-level indicators. Multiple sets of outcomes can add unnecessary complexity and prevent desirable practices such as the establishment of CoP and sharing of knowledge. In that sense, outcomes could have been streamlined across all components, as there are sufficient commonalities between the three sets of outcomes. Moreover, outcome indicators should be high-level. They should enable the analysis of the effective changes that took place in each country, instead of measuring outputs.

project_symbols:

NO_DC_SYMBOL_73

url:

https://webapps.ilo.org/ievaldiscovery/recommendations/16449

information_source:

Head Quarters

---