Go to ILO main website
Back to index

Migrant Rights and Decent Work (MiRiDeW) - Final Evaluation

eval_number:
2955
eval_url:
https://webapps.ilo.org/ievaldiscovery/eval/2955
location:
country:
Nepal
region:
Asia and the Pacific

eval_title:
Migrant Rights and Decent Work (MiRiDeW) - Final Evaluation
recommendations:
date:
2023-07-24 00:00:00.0
themes:
theme:
Organizational issues
category:
Planning and programme design

action_plan:
Completed.
management_response:
Completed
progress:
Achieved
admin_units:
CO-Kathmandu
title:
The ILO must consider the phase 2 of MiRiDeW as capitalisation phase where the focus must be to complete the ongoing activities and build upon the successes of the phase 1. The ILO must consider lessons and good practices in this process. The specific measures that the ILO must undertake are the following: 1. ILO must form a Phase 2 project designing committee and include MoLESS, NPA, MoFA, SDC and the technical experts as members. In order to achieve operational efficiency, the ILO can present the draft project design along with log-frame and seek feedback from partners. In case the joint meeting of all the stakeholders is not feasible, the ILO can meet these three important stakeholders separately to take their feedback before finalizing the proposal. As already mentioned, the ILO must formalize this process by seeking approval of the project and by signing a MoU. 2. The phase 2 design must focus on narrowing down the scope of the project to a maximum of three outcomes, wherein outcome 1 and 4 can be merged to have an outcome with focus on ‘creating enabling environment and generating evidences for policy changes for labour migration governance’. Under this Outcome, the outputs can focus on finalizing the monitoring and reporting framework including recruitment cost survey, labour migration report and influencing policies around gender sensitive labour governance’. However, while narrowing down the scope, the project design must consider risks associated with it and must develop mitigation plans. The mitigation plan must have the flexibility to respond to government needs and priorities.
project_symbols:
NPL/18/01/CHE
url:
https://webapps.ilo.org/ievaldiscovery/recommendations/17191
information_source:
Country Office

Skip to top