ILO

Back to index

Action against child trafficking for labour and sexual exploitation in Peru – phase II - Final evaluation

eval_number:

2344623

eval_url:

https://webapps.ilo.org/ievaldiscovery/eval/2344623

location:

country:

Peru

region:

Americas

---

eval_title:

Action against child trafficking for labour and sexual exploitation in Peru – phase II - Final evaluation

recommendations:

date:

2026-07-07 00:00:00.0

themes:

theme:

Organizational issues

category:

Planning and programme design

---

action_plan:

La Oficina ha incorporado el principio de diseño centrado en resultados en la formulación de nuevos proyectos, en materia de inspección del trabajo y derechos fundamentales (p.ej. derechos colectivos, trabajo forzoso, trabajo infantil). El marco lógico de los nuevos proyectos establece los cambios institucionales deseadas y las actividades propuestas para lograrlas. Asimismo, la Oficina compartirá esta recomendación con los colegas que se dediquen a la formulación de nuevos proyectos, para su debida atención. Adicionalmente, se buscará incorporar momentos periódicos de revisión en los proyectos de gran duración en el tiempo y asegurar la trazabilidad entre los documentos.

management_response:

Partially Completed

progress:

Partially achieved

admin_units:

DWT/CO-Lima

title:

Focusing the Project design on the changes to be promoted rather than on the activities to be implemented The main agents of the Project had very clear ideas regarding the course of action to be undertaken and there was a period of adaptation of the initial design of the project that served to ground its formulation and adjust it to the needs. This was fortunate because the project was not directly oriented to the results it is was aimed at. This was partly due to the structure of the formulation documents used (LFM, for example), where it is the activity that establishes the line of work and not the result, not even the output. A project where the number of expected results is greater than the activities that will contribute to their achievement subverts the usual logic of project design. Furthermore, a project so ambitious in budget and, above all, in time, requires more moments of ToC review, in order to ensure that work is being done in the right direction. In Partnerships, the LFM was adapted to a greater extent and, at the time this evaluator team analysed these management instruments, there was not a full correspondence between them (for example, the codes were no longer traceable from one document to another). For future ILO projects or other agencies in the area of human rights or child protection, it is recommended to prioritise designs that focus more on the desired results or structural changes to be promoted. From these, the outputs to be produced, as well as the necessary conditions and assumptions, should be derived. At the same time, this approach should help define the activities through which these outputs will be achieved. All of this should be done using tools such as robust and up-to-date Theory of Change frameworks, along with clear monitoring systems that link outputs, results, and impact.

project_symbols:

PER/17/51/USA

url:

https://webapps.ilo.org/ievaldiscovery/recommendations/2344712

information_source:

Country Office

---