WHO - World Health Organization
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 | next >
Judgment No. |
Session No. |
Full text |
3585 |
121st Session, 2016
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant challenges a decision to dismiss her internal appeal against her performance appraisal reports and the reclassification of her post. |
3584 |
121st Session, 2016
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant challenges his non-selection for a vacant post, alleging personal prejudice, and contests the transfer of the selected candidate to a commensurate post. |
3583 |
121st Session, 2016
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant, a WHO staff member assigned to WHO’s India Country Office, challenges the decision not to accept his claims for the retroactive reclassification of his post. |
3582 |
121st Session, 2016
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant challenges the decision not to extend her fixed-term appointment following the abolition of her position. |
3561 |
121st Session, 2016
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant seeks a review of Judgment 3141 on the basis that a new fact has allegedly come to light. |
3552 |
120th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| As the complaint is clearly irreceivable, it is summarily dismissed. |
3551 |
120th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| As the complaint is clearly irreceivable, it is summarily dismissed. |
3473 |
120th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant applies for review of Judgment 3296, by which the Tribunal dismissed his second complaint. |
3472 |
120th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant applies for review of Judgment 3380, claiming that the Tribunal failed to adjudicate on several allegations he made. |
3471 |
120th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant applies for review of Judgment 3242, asking that some of the Tribunal’s findings be overturned. |
3453 |
119th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| The Tribunal summarily dismissed the complaint as clearly irreceivable. |
3439 |
119th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant successfully challenges the decision to terminate his appointment after the abolition of his post, as the Tribunal found that, due to the Organisation's failings, he had lost a valuable opportunity to be reassigned to another post. |
3396 |
119th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| In relation with the complainant's service-incurred illness, the Tribunal concluded that she was entitled to an invalidity payment. |
3393 |
118th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complaint is summarily dismissed as filed out of time. |
3392 |
118th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The Tribunal summarily dismissed the applications for interpretation and for review. |
3380 |
118th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant challenges his non-selection for a post following a competition and alleges perpetual administrative bias towards him. |
3379 |
118th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| As the complainant did not identify any of the grounds upon which a judgment may be reviewed, his application for review was summarily dismissed. |
3366 |
118th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant impugns the decision not to transmit to the Board of Appeal his claim concerning the displaying of his photo in the security premises of the Organisation following his dismissal. |
3365 |
118th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant impugns the decision dismissing his harassment complaint and his allegations of denial of justice. |
3364 |
118th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant successfully impugns on the grounds of a procedural flaw the decision to maintain his dismissal for misconduct. |
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 | next >
|