EPO - European Patent Organisation
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54 | next >
| Judgment No. |
Session No. |
Full text |
| 3430 |
119th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| | The Tribunal found that, in imposing the sanction of dismissal, the President of the EPO had not exceeded the bounds of her discretionary authority. |
| 3429 |
119th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| | The Tribunal dismissed the complaint but awarded damages to the complainant because of the delay in the appeals procedure. |
| 3428 |
119th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainants unsuccessfully challenge decisions that were not followed by individual implementing decisions. |
| 3427 |
119th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainants unsuccessfully challenge a series of decisions concerning pension issues, those being decisions of general application. |
| 3426 |
119th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainants challenged decisions relating to tax adjustment for EPO pensioners, but the Tribunal found that those decisions had not caused them any injury. |
| 3395 |
119th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| | The Tribunal considered that the complainant was entitled to compensation for the EPO's failure to comply with the Tribunal's order. |
| 3385 |
118th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | As the complainant did not identify any of the grounds upon which a judgment may be reviewed, his application for review is summarily dismissed. |
| 3384 |
118th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complaint is summarily dismissed because the complainant did not impugn a final decision. |
| 3375 |
118th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant claims, on the basis of an alleged acquired right, the application of the invalidity pension scheme in force prior to his placement on non-active status on grounds of invalidity. |
| 3370 |
118th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant, who performed duties at a higher level than his grade, impugns the decision not to grant him a promotion and acting allowance, and partially succeeds on the basis that the Organisation breached its duty of care. |
| 3369 |
118th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant impugns the application of deductions to her dependant’s allowance for participation in a strike and the amount deducted from most elements of her remuneration. |
| 3363 |
118th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant impugns the decision to forward to the President his appeal filed with the Administrative Council. |
| 3358 |
118th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant, who has dual nationality, impugns the cessation of the payment of an education allowance on the ground that he was a national of the country in which he served. |
| 3354 |
118th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The Tribunal set aside the decision dismissing the complainant’s request for the reimbursement of pharmaceutical costs on the ground that the case should have been referred to the Medical Committee. |
| 3352 |
118th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainants challenge the result of the evaluation of their job grade. |
| 3346 |
118th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainants, acting as Staff Committee representatives in the General Advisory Committee, challenge the President’s interpretation of the GAC’s opinion regarding pension contributions. |
| 3343 |
118th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant, acting as a staff representative, challenges the Organisation’s direct placement of a contract with an external consulting firm. |
| 3342 |
118th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainants, acting as members of the Staff Committee, challenge the competence of the President of the Office to appoint Vice-Presidents on an ad interim basis. |
| 3341 |
118th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainants, acting as successive Chairmen of the Central Staff Committee (CSC), impugn the President’s decision not to submit to the Administrative Council a CSC document regarding the protection of human rights within the Office. |
| 3340 |
118th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | After having been appointed to a post at a higher grade, the complainant challenges the calculation of his step-in-grade. |
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54 | next >
|
