EPO - European Patent Organisation
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54 | next >
Judgment No. |
Session No. |
Full text |
3338 |
118th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant, who is serving in the Netherlands and who no longer has Dutch nationality, impugns the decision not to help him to obtain the non-permanent resident status and tax-free car registration. |
3337 |
118th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| Considering that his harassment complaint has not been treated within a reasonable time, the complainant asks the Tribunal to sanction the Organisation for breach of its duty of care. |
3336 |
118th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| Considering that his personal particulars form showing his total retirement pension should also show the amount of the internal tax levied on it, the complainant impugns the decision dismissing his request to modify this document. |
3335 |
118th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant impugns the decision dismissing his appeal against the alleged double taxation (both national and internal) of his retirement pension. |
3331 |
118th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| Considering that the Internal Appeals Committee had not examined his appeal within a reasonable time, the complainant filed his complaint directly with the Tribunal. |
3326 |
117th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complaint, which is clearly irreceivable, is summarily dismissed on the grounds that the complainant failed to exhaust internal means of redress. |
3325 |
117th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complaint against a decision of the Chairman of the Internal Appeals Committee is irreceivable on the grounds that this decision is not a final one. |
3319 |
117th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant impugns the decision to introduce a total smoking ban in all premises of the Organisation. |
3317 |
117th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant impugns the decision not to prolong his service beyond the normal retirement age. |
3316 |
117th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant impugns the decision not to prolong his service beyond the normal retirement age. |
3310 |
117th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant asks for the recalculation of an education allowance by reference to the dependent handicapped child allowance (instead of on the basis of the dependent child allowance). |
3309 |
117th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant contests the Administrative Council’s decision modifying the calculation method for the annual leave entitlement of employees on part-time sick leave. |
3308 |
117th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant, acting as a member of the Staff Committee, impugns the Administrative Council’s decision modifying the power of the appointing authority to adopt a new recruitment procedure for Principal Directors. |
3306 |
117th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant contests the Administration’s interpretation and application of the opinion of the Medical Board regarding the end of his sick leave. |
3302 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complaints were dismissed for non-exhaustion of internal remedies under Article 7 of the Tribunal’s Rules. |
3301 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant through five irreceivable complaints requested information concerning facts that occurred before his retirement for disability. |
3300 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The Tribunal dismissed the complaint filed against the decision not to consider the complainant's disability as resulting from an occupational disease. |
3297 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant was dismissed for misconduct following a disciplinary investigation, which found that he had forged and falsified documents. |
3291 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| The Tribunal dismisses fifty-six similar complaints on the grounds that they are directed against general and not individual decisions. |
3285 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| In his first complaint, the complainant impugns the decision denying him an extension of employment beyond the age of 65. By his second complaint, he seeks to challenge the appointment of his successor. |
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54 | next >
|